Why a 50 Year Mortgage Won’t Work in Australia

In the U.S., Donald Trump recently floated the idea of a 50 years mortgage, expanding the standard 30-year term to half a century. The stated goal is simple: reduce monthly repayments and make home ownership more accessible amid high property prices and elevated interest rates.

The logic sounds appealing — stretch the repayment period, lower the monthly cost. But as history shows, what looks like affordability on paper often carries long-term risks. In the U.S., economists, lenders and policy experts are divided. Many warn that extending the term doesn’t solve affordability — it simply delays the pain.

 

Is Australia ready for it? Let’s find out.

Australia vs the U.S.: A Key Comparison

Before exploring whether Australia should consider a 50 years mortgage, it’s important to recognise the differences between the two markets.

• Loan norms: In the U.S., 30-year fixed-rate mortgages are standard, often backed by government agencies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In Australia, variable or shorter fixed-rate loans (1–5 years) dominate.

• Regulation: The U.S. mortgage system is highly securitised, meaning loans are often sold into secondary markets. Australia’s banks hold loans on their balance sheets, making them more exposed to long-term risk.

• Retirement model: Australia’s superannuation system assumes homeowners will retire largely debt-free. Extending mortgage terms to 50 years directly conflicts with that financial reality.

• Demographics: Australia’s population is ageing faster, making long-term debt riskier for household stability.

 

Why the 50 Years Mortgage Seems Tempting

The idea’s appeal is easy to understand. Australia faces some of the highest house prices relative to income in the world. For first-home buyers, lower monthly repayments could open doors previously out of reach.

Politically, it can be framed as a “helping hand” policy for young Australians. Lower entry costs, easier approval, and more people getting onto the property ladder — all sound like wins.

However, beneath the surface lies a host of problems that could make things far worse over time.

Why It’s a Poor Fit for Australia

Slow Equity Build-Up

With a 50 years mortgage, borrowers spend decades paying mostly interest, not principal. For context, on a 30-year mortgage, a borrower may own around 10% of their property after six years; on a 50-year loan, it could take 17 years to reach the same level.

In Australia, where financial planning and retirement strategies are built around owning your home outright, this delay in equity growth could undermine personal financial security for millions.

 

Higher Lifetime Interest Costs

Extending repayment periods dramatically increases total interest paid. Even if monthly repayments fall, the borrower ultimately pays far more over the life of the loan.

For instance, a $700,000 mortgage at 6% over 30 years totals about $1.5 million in repayments. Stretch that to 50 years, and it exceeds $2 million. That’s over $500,000 extra in interest for the same home — an enormous long-term cost for “short-term relief.”

 

Risk of Driving Up House Prices

A key risk — and one often ignored — is that longer loan terms boost borrowing capacity, which can inflate property prices.

If buyers can suddenly afford “more” per month, sellers can raise prices accordingly. In the U.S., analysts on forums like Reddit and Marginal Revolution have pointed out that extended amortisation could simply “stretch prices upward.”

For Australia, already constrained by tight housing supply, labour shortages, and expensive construction, this would worsen affordability, not improve it.

 

Misaligned with Retirement and Superannuation

In the Australian context, this is perhaps the most serious concern. A 50 years mortgage started at age 30 means repayments until age 80 — well beyond the traditional retirement horizon.

This would force Australians to either:

• Work much longer,

• Divert superannuation savings to cover repayments, or

• Retire with large outstanding debts.

None of these align with the objectives of our superannuation or social welfare system.

 

Financial Stability Risks

From a prudential standpoint, lenders and regulators would face serious challenges.Long-term loans mean:

• Slower equity accumulation (riskier for banks)

• Greater exposure to economic shocks

• More potential for negative equity in downturns

Both the U.S. (under the Dodd-Frank framework) and Australia’s APRA maintain rules discouraging ultra-long mortgages for precisely these reasons. The longer the loan, the more unpredictable the risk profile becomes.

 

It Fixes the Symptom, Not the Disease

Housing affordability in Australia isn’t primarily a financing problem — it’s a supply problem. Key drivers include:

• Land release restrictions and zoning red tape

• Construction cost inflation and material shortages

• Insufficient new housing supply

  
  

Extending loan terms is a financial patch, not a structural solution. It gives the illusion of affordability while deepening the debt trap.

Better Alternatives for Australia

Instead of adopting a 50-year mortgage, Australian policymakers should focus on:

• Increasing supply: Fast-track approvals and incentivise new builds.

• Shared equity schemes: Government co-ownership models can help without inflating prices.

• Boosting incomes: Wage growth and employment security help genuine affordability.

• Rental reform: Encourage quality, stable long-term rentals as an alternative path to security.

These approaches strengthen affordability without amplifying systemic risks.

Final Thoughts: A Warning for Policymakers

While the 50 years mortgage may look like an easy fix, its costs outweigh its benefits — particularly in Australia’s context. It could entrench intergenerational debt, raise property prices, undermine retirement security, and destabilise lending markets.

If ever considered, it should be highly targeted, tightly regulated, and accompanied by supply-side reforms — not rolled out as a mass-market product.

For now, Australians should treat the idea with caution and recognise it for what it is: a political soundbite, not a sustainable solution.

 

Explore More

Want more expert insights on Australian property trends, policy analysis, and market forecasts? Explore more articles at Alpha Real Property - your trusted source for data-driven real estate insights.